People v. McKayPeople v. McKay
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that he was denied his statutory right to testify before the grand jury (see
The defendant’s conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree (see
Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.