People v. McDonaldPeople v. McDonald
—Appeal by
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the jury charge with regard to the counts of assault in the second degree and resisting arrest was inadequate because certain terms in the charge were not defined. However, the charge on these two counts was proper, as the court employed the charge recommended in the pattern jury instructions (see, People v Brown,
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.