People v. McConnellPeople v. McConnell
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree, defendant argues that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials. "In reviewing a determination of the suppression court, great weight must be accorded its decision because of its ability to observe and assess the credibility of the witnesses and its findings should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous” (People v Hill,
After defendant was given Miranda warnings, he declined to speak with the police. Questioning of defendant ceased, but, in defendant’s presence, an investigator reported to a detective that bloody clothing had been found. Defendant then waived his Miranda rights and gave a confession. Defendant argues that the statement made by the investigator was the functional equivalent of interrogation designed to elicit an incriminating response (see, People v Ferro,