People v. McClainPeople v. McClain
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the factfinder, which saw and heard the witnesses, and its determination should be accorded great deference on appeal (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645 [2006]; People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the sentence imposed on the conviction of attempted assault in the first degree was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86 [1982]).
Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.