People v. McCallPeople v. McCall
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see,
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in allowing a nine-year-old witness to give sworn testimony is unpreserved for appellate review to the extent that he bases his claim on the scope of the inquiry by the Supreme Court at the hearing to determine the child’s ability to testify (see,
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte,