People v. McCallPeople v. McCall
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes,
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in allowing a nine-year-old witness to give sworn testimony is unpreserved for appellate review to the extent that he bases his claim on the scope of the inquiry by the Supreme Court at the hearing to determine the child’s ability to testify (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dorsey,
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte,