People v. MatosPeople v. Matos
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The element of serious physical injury was satisfied by evidence supporting the conclusion that the wounds inflicted by defendant caused serious disfigurement to both victims’ faces under the standard set forth in People v McKinnon (15 NY3d 311, 315-316 [2010]). Photographs depicting the victims’ scars, medical testimony, testimony from the victims, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence as to each victim warranted the conclusion that the elements of
We have considered and rejected defendant‘s remaining claims concerning the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.