6 Cal. 477 | Cal. | 1856
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
In the absence of anything appearing to the contrary, the legal intendment would arise from the fact of the bill being signed by the Judge, that the same was done regularly. In fact, it is difficult to sec how the failure or refusal to sign a bill of exceptions could defeat the party’s right of appeal.
On examination, it will be found that no analogy whatever exists between this case and the one of Leech v. Allen. 2 Cal., 95.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.