People v. MaronePeople v. Marone
Defendant‘s claim that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive is foreclosed given that he entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and an unqualified waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; People v Clow, 10 AD3d 803 [2004]). We further decline to review the claims raised in defendant‘s pro se supplemental brief as they either pertain to the severity of the sentence or
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.