midpage

People v. ManninaPeople v. Mannina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 22, 2011
Versions:89 A.D.3d 1038
933 N.Y.2d 570

The defendant‘s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced him upon his violation of a condition of his probation without ordering an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gambichler, 25 AD3d 722, 723 [2006]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282 [1994]; cf. People v Pons, 134 AD2d 378, 378-379 [1987]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Mannina
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 22, 2011
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 1038; 933 N.Y.2d 570
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In