midpage

People v. ManigaultPeople v. Manigault

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 23, 2002
Versions:297 A.D.2d 754
747 N.Y.S.2d 787
747 N.Y.2d 787
2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court’s examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor’s summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court’s questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Manigault
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 23, 2002
Citations: 297 A.D.2d 754; 747 N.Y.S.2d 787; 747 N.Y.2d 787; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In