midpage

People v. ManigaultPeople v. Manigault

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 23, 2002
Versions:

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court’s examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor’s summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court’s questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Manigault
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 23, 2002
Citations: 297 A.D.2d 754; 747 N.Y.S.2d 787; 747 N.Y.2d 787; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In