Docket 7311 | Mich. Ct. App. | Apr 27, 1971
PEOPLE
v.
MALONE
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Arthur J. Tarnow, State Appellate Defender, for defendant.
*180 Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and FITZGERALD and LEVIN, JJ.
Reversed by Supreme Court and remanded to trial court, 385 Mich. 769.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Emmett Malone was charged, along with two other young men, with the crimes of kidnaping[1] and carnal knowledge of a female under 16 years of age.[2] Defendant, while represented by counsel, pled guilty to assault with intent to rape[3] and was sentenced to serve from five to ten years in prison.
After he pled guilty and at the time of sentencing, the defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty, asserting that his attorney had talked him into pleading guilty despite his innocence. Defendant's motion was denied. A formal motion to withdraw his guilty plea and vacate sentence was subsequently filed and denied in a written opinion by the trial judge. Defendant appeals and assigns as error the trial court's refusal to allow him to withdraw his plea of guilty.
The rule in Michigan is that there is no absolute right on the part of an accused person to withdraw a plea of guilty. People v. Zaleski (1965), 375 Mich. 71" court="Mich." date_filed="1965-03-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-zaleski-2161355?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2161355">375 Mich. 71; People v. Whitmer (1969), 16 Mich. App. 703" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1969-03-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-whitmer-2162432?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2162432">16 Mich. App. 703. Withdrawal of a guilty plea is a matter confided to the discretion of the trial judge and his exercise of his discretion is not reversed unless there is abuse. People v. Pulliam (1968), 10 Mich. App. 481" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1968-03-29" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-pulliam-1761627?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1761627">10 Mich. App. 481.
Defendant's claim that he was talked into pleading guilty by his attorney was denied by the attorney. The judge, after listening to both the defendant and his attorney, declined to credit the defendant's claim.
In denying the defendant's post-sentence motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, the judge said that *181 the defendant's at-time-of-sentence motion to withdraw his plea was made only after a codefendant was sentenced to serve a term of seven to ten years. See People v. Davis (1964), 372 Mich. 402" court="Mich." date_filed="1964-03-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-davis-1925380?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1925380">372 Mich. 402.
We are satisfied from our examination of the record that the judge did not err in accepting the plea or in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Affirmed.
NOTES
[1] MCLA § 750.349 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.581).
[2] MCLA § 750.520 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788).
[3] MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280).