People v. MaldonadoPeople v. Maldonado
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), the evidence adduced at trial was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts) beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see
However, the fourth count of the indictment, charging the defendant with assault in the second degree (see
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.
Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Dickerson, JJ., concur.