People v. MaldonadoPeople v. Maldonado
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Szyjko, 17 AD3d 609 [2005]; People v Immel, 288 AD2d 235, 236 [2001]; People v Taylor, 245 AD2d 398, 398-399 [1997]). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to reach these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see
Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.