History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. MacKenzie
875 N.Y.S.2d 908
N.Y. App. Div.
2009
Check Treatment

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v MICHAEL MACKENZIE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

875 NYS2d 908

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Bartlett, J.), dated February 4, 2008, which, after a hearing, granted those branches of the defendant‘s omnibus motion which were to suppress the results of breathalyzer tests and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the People‘s contention, the stop of the defendant‘s vehicle was unlawful, because reasonable suspicion to believe that he had violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375 (2) (a) (1) was lacking (see generally

Whren v United States, 517 US 806, 810 [1996];
People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413, 414 [1975]
;
People v Sluszka, 15 AD3d 421, 423-424 [2005]
). Accordingly, the County Court properly granted those branches of the defendant‘s omnibus motion which were to suppress the results of the breathalyzer tests and his statements to law enforcement officials (see
People v Smith, 1 AD3d 965 [2003]
;
Matter of Byer v Jackson, 241 AD2d 943, 944-945 [1997]
;
People v Perez, 149 AD2d 344, 345 [1989]
). Fisher, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. MacKenzie
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 7, 2009
Citation: 875 N.Y.S.2d 908
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.