People v. MackPeople v. Mack
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defеndant‘s assigned сounsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could bе raised on appeal. Counsel‘s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.