People v. LudwigsenPeople v. Ludwigsen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant‘s contention that the jury‘s rejection of his extreme emotional disturbance defense was against the weight of the evidence is without merit (see
The defendant‘s remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Lifson, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.