History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Linscott
1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12317
N.Y. App. Div.
1998
Check Treatment

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant argues and the People concede that the record before *1008County Court does not contain sufficient evidence to support the amount of restitution ordered (cf, People v Kim, 91 NY2d 407, 411; see generally, People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140, 144-146). Consequently, we modify the judgment by vacating the amount of restitution, and we remit the matter to Jefferson County Court to determine the actual amount of the victim’s out-of-pocket loss (see, People v Lynch, — AD2d — [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J. — Attempted Criminal Mischief, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Linscott
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 13, 1998
Citation: 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12317
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.