OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of the crimes of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree for stealing merchandise at a Duane Reade store. At trial, the People introduced into evidence two trespass notices revoking defendant’s privilege to enter Duane Reade stores. Because defendant failed to assert at the time of the trial that the admission of the notices violated his right of confrontation, the issue is not
*857
preserved for our review
(see generally People v
Gray,
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.