midpage

People v. LinerPeople v. Liner

New York Court of Appeals
Jul 2, 2007
Versions:

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of the crimes of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree for stealing merchandise at a Duane Reade store. At trial, the People introduced into evidence two trespass notices revoking defendant’s privilege to enter Duane Reade stores. Because defendant failed to assert at the time of the trial that the admission of the notices violated his right of confrontation, the issue is not preserved for our review (see generally People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Liner
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 2, 2007
Citations: 9 N.Y.3d 856; 872 N.E.2d 868; 840 N.Y.S.2d 755
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In