People v. LewisPeople v. Lewis
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the trial court did not err in granting the prosecutor‘s challenge for cause to a prospective juror (see People v Rennie, 34 AD3d 504 [2006]; cf. People v Oliveri, 29 AD3d 330 [2006]).
The defendant‘s challenges to allegedly prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor on summation and allegedly prejudicial questions on the defendant‘s cross-examination are unpreserved for appellate review (see
The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Carni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.