History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Levy
15 N.Y.2d 910
NY
1965
Check Treatment

Motion by appellants Levy and D ’Antonio to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendants argued that they were deprived of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment when the People called a witness (Daniel Cohen) to the stand to testify knowing that he would claim privilege against self incrimination and then read to the jury his alleged confession. The Court of Appeals held that there was no violation of defendants’ constitutional rights. [See 15 N Y 2d 159.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Levy
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 11, 1965
Citation: 15 N.Y.2d 910
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.