History
  • No items yet
midpage
24 A.D.3d 1246
N.Y. App. Div.
2005

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v ROBERT LEE, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York

805 NYS2d 892

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stephen R. Sirkin, A.J.), rendered December 9, 2002.

The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at the suppression court (Francis A. Affronti, J.). We add only that the record does not support defendant’s contention that the sentencing court (Stephen R. Sirkin, A.J.), failed to apprehend the extent of its discretion in fixing the period of postrelease supervision (cf. People v Schafer, 19 AD3d 1133 [2005]; People v Hager, 213 AD2d 1008 [1995]), nor is the period of postrelease supervision unduly harsh or severe. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Lee
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 22, 2005
Citations: 24 A.D.3d 1246; 805 N.Y.S.2d 892
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    People v. Lee, 24 A.D.3d 1246