People v. Layne

Jan 15, 2015
13953 89/11
Versions:124 A.D.3d 466
1 N.Y.S.3d 86

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Defendant‘s participation in a conspiracy to sell drugs and possess weapons was established by recorded telephone conversations, as well as police observations of defendant at the drug-selling location. The only reasonable interpretation of the recorded calls was that defendant was exercising a supervisory role over the operation, rather than merely chatting about other persons’ criminal activity. In addition to establishing the conspiracy, defendant‘s instructions to others satisfied the requirement of overt acts (see People v Lugo, 309 AD2d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 598 [2004]).

The court properly admitted declarations by coconspirators during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The People established a prima facie case of conspiracy against defendant based upon his own statements and other evidence, without resort to the declarations sought to be introduced (see generally People v Salko, 47 NY2d 230, 237-238 [1979]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.