People v. Lawrence

Oct 23, 2007
Versions:44 A.D.3d 967
843 N.Y.S.2d 515

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The defendant‘s argument that the resentence imposed was the product of vindictiveness was not preserved for appellate review (see People v Norris, 34 AD3d 500, 501 [2006]). In any event, the record indicates that the County Court did not act vindictively in resentencing the defendant (see People v Irrizarry, 37 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2007]; People v Somerville, 33 AD3d 733, 734 [2006]).

The defendant‘s remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Crane, J.P., Spolzino, Krausman and McCarthy, JJ., concur.