—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecutor’s comment during summation concerning the defendant’s failure to make certain exculpatory statements to the police was a fair response to defense counsel’s summation (see, People v Peralta, 172 AD2d 155; People v Rivera, 158 AD2d 723; cf., People v Spinelli, 214 AD2d 135, 142).
The defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
