People v. LacroixPeople v. Lacroix
Defendant‘s contention that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary or intelligent because County Court failed to properly inform him of the resulting sentence if he violated the terms of interim probation is not precluded by his waiver of the right to appeal and was preserved by his motion to withdraw the plea (see People v. White, 85 AD3d 1493, 1493 [2011]; People v. First, 62 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 915 [2009]). As defendant argues, he was misadvised at the time of the plea that the sentence to be imposed was 1 1/3 to 4 years in prison, when, in fact, it was 2 to 4 years (see
Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that