History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Kroemer
151 A.D.2d 1049
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1989
|
Check Treatment

Motion to change venue from Ontario County denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and *1050impartial trial cannot be had” in Ontario County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature. (See, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Lafferty, 144 AD2d 1038; People v Carlson, 143 AD2d 542; People v Simmons, 132 AD2d 1009; People v Oakes, 130 AD2d 980; People v Rivera, 130 AD2d 980.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Kroemer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 2, 1989
Citation: 151 A.D.2d 1049
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.