History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Kirton
719 N.Y.S.2d 604
N.Y. App. Div.
2001
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), imposed June 16, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was imposed, was excessive (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825; People v Brathwaite, 63 NY2d 839). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Kirton
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 22, 2001
Citation: 719 N.Y.S.2d 604
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In