The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lashawna King, Appellant.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
912 NYS2d 423
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant‘s contention that her plea of guilty to promoting prostitution in the second degree under superior court information No. 1728/08 was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered is unpreserved for appellate review, since she did not move to withdraw her plea on this basis prior to sentencing (see People v Trent, 74 AD3d 1370 [2010]; People v Hollingsworth, 74 AD3d 1359 [2010]; People v Shell, 73 AD3d 1095 [2010]). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant‘s pleas were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).
The defendant‘s contention that it was impossible for her to commit the crime of promoting prostitution in the second degree because she was acting as a prostitute herself when she offered herself and a minor to two undercover police officers (see
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
