History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Kimmons
227 A.D.2d 984
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his due process and equal protection rights were violated by the nearly eight-year delay between the filing of his notice of appeal and the perfection of the appeal. The delay in the perfection of the appeal is in large part attributable to defendant’s failure to proceed pro se or to request assigned counsel (see, People v Gonzalez, 184 AD2d 525, 526, lv denied 80 NY2d 904; cf., Simmons v Reynolds, 898 F2d 865). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Kimmons
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 31, 1996
Citation: 227 A.D.2d 984
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.