History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Kealey
33 N.Y.2d 897
NY
1973
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following; Upon appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant-appellant argued that he had been denied due process of law because the statute under which he was convicted (Penal Law, § 125.10) is unconstitutionally vague. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 33 N Y 2d 818.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Kealey
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 27, 1973
Citation: 33 N.Y.2d 897
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.