Judgment of conviction and order affirmed. All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that the admission of the evidence of the implication of the defendant in independent burglaries, in no wise connected with the property mentioned in the indictment, was prejudicial error requiring a reversal. (See People v. Doty, 175 N. Y. 164.)
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
