People v. JonesPeople v. Jones
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant entered a truck with intent to commit a crime (see People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1979];
Since defendant‘s objection to evidence of an unidentified woman‘s exclamation to a police officer did not articulate any of the arguments raised on appeal, those arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject them on the merits. We have considered and rejected defendant‘s argument that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to make the appropriate objection.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.