History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Johnson
499 Mich. 851
| Mich. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse, in part, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we remand this case to the Tuscola Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence *852absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resen-tence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Johnson
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 2, 2016
Citation: 499 Mich. 851
Docket Number: No. 151535; Court of Appeals No. 318833
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.