People v. JohnsonPeople v. Johnson
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 10, 1984, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On the instant appeal, the defendant argues, inter alia, that the Supreme Court committed prejudicial error in its Sandoval ruling by allowing the People to cross-examine him with respect to three prior misdemeanor convictions. This argument must be rejected. The defendant "forfeited his right to challenge the court’s adverse Sandoval ruling by his plea of guilty” (People v Thompson,
The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination after a Wade hearing that the photographic identification procedures utilized by the police were "constitutionally fair and not suggestive” and that the victims could make in-court identifications of the defendant at trial (see, People v Garcia,
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.