History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Jenkins
22 N.Y.2d 675
NY
1968
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

As indicated in the opinion in People v. Lennon (22 N Y 2d 677), also decided today, there is no need to corroborate the testimony of the complainant in order to sustain the defendants’ convictions for the crimes, other than rape and assault with intent to commit rape, charged against them. The other contentions advanced have been considered and found to be without substance.

The judgments appealed from should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Bkeitel and Jasen concur.

Judgments affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Jenkins
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 16, 1968
Citation: 22 N.Y.2d 675
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.