People v. JenkinsPeople v. Jenkins
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, so as to provide that the term of imprisonment imposed for the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently to the terms of imprisonment imposed for the robbery convictions; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes,
However, the sentence imposed for the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree should have been made to run concurrently to the sentences imposed upon the robbery convictions, since possession of the weapon constituted a "material element” of the robbery offenses (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; People v Day,
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.