midpage

People v. JagrooPeople v. Jagroo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 17, 2014
2012-05695
Versions:123 A.D.3d 945
996 N.Y.S.2d 924

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), imposed May 23, 2012, upon his conviction of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant‘s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Jagroo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 17, 2014
Citations: 123 A.D.3d 945; 996 N.Y.S.2d 924; 2012-05695
Docket Number: 2012-05695
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In