People v. JacksonPeople v. Jackson
The accusatory instrument was legally sufficient to establish the element of entry without license or privilege, and it was not required to negate the possibility that one of the numerous residents of the building invited defendant to enter (see People v Davis, 13 NY3d 17, 31-32 [2009]; see also Lonique M., 93 AD3d at 207). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Clark, JJ.