People v. JacksonPeople v. Jackson
The court properly denied defendant‘s requests to represent himself, which were equivocal since they were overshadowed by his numerous other applications (see People v Payton, 45 NY2d 300, 314 [1978], revd on other grounds 445 US 573 [1980]), and which were part of a course of conduct “calculated to undermine, upset or unreasonably delay the progress of the trial” (People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d 10, 18 [1974]).
The respective courts properly denied defense counsel‘s pretrial and midtrial requests that defendant be examined pursuant to
Defendant‘s constitutional challenge to the procedure under
We have considered and rejected defendant‘s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.