People v. JacksonPeople v. Jackson
It is hereby ordered that the amended sentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Contrary to defendant‘s contention, it was not necessary for County Court, “in ordering restitution in addition to imprisonment, to consider defendant‘s ability to pay” (People v Emmi, 254 AD2d 840, 840 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 949 [1998]; see People v Holmes, 300 AD2d 1072, 1073 [2002]; People v Weinberg, 213 AD2d 506, 507 [1995], lv denied 88 NY2d 970 [1996]; see generally