People v. InsognaPeople v. Insogna
Judgmеnt unanimously modified, on the law and fаcts, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of burglary in the second degreе (Penal Law, § 140.25) must be reversed for failure of proof of a necessary element of the crimе. In order to sustain a convictiоn of burglary, the People must prоve that a defendant knowingly entered or remained unlawfully in or upon premises, i.e., that he was not licensed or privileged to be there (Penal Law, § 140.00, subd 5; People v Letko,