People v. Hunter

Sep 30, 2016
Reporters:
,
Before:
Carni

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [b]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the two counts of robbery in the second degree in this nonjury trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). “In a bench trial, no less than a jury trial, the resolution of credibility issues by the trier of fact and its determination of the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are entitled to great deference” (People v Ghent, 132 AD3d 1275, 1275 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1145 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v McCoy, 100 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2012]). The victim‘s testimony was not incredible as a matter of law (see People v Ptak, 37 AD3d 1081, 1082 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 949 [2007]), and County Court was entitled to accept the victim‘s testimony and reject the testimony of defendant and his codefendant that there was no robbery and that they were playing a practical joke on the victim. “[U]pon our review of the record, we cannot say that the court failed to give the evidence the weight that it should be accorded” (People v Britt, 298 AD2d 984, 984 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 556 [2002]). Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, DeJoseph and Scudder, JJ.