People v. HuntPeople v. Hunt
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered March 27, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.
We reject defendant’s various challenges to the People’s use of expert testimony. The court properly deemed the arresting officer an expert in street level narcotics operations. The officer, a six-year veteran assigned to the Street Narcotics Enforcement Unit for almost two years prior to testifying, who had received special training and had been involved in over 500 narcotics arrests by the time of trial, was qualified to explain to the jury the routines and jargon peculiar to such transactions (see, People v Rodgers,
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.