Appeal by the defendant
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
On February 5, 1985, the defendant was convicted of sodomizing a 17-year-old girl. This court reversed the defendant’s conviction on grounds not relevant to the instant appeal and ordered a new trial (People v Hults,
Although the trial court has discretion to reopen a suppression hearing or permit the defendant to make a suppression motion for the first time after an appellate court has remitted the case for a new trial, absent newly discovered evidence or a directive in the order remitting the case for a new trial, the defendant is not entitled to a de novo suppression hearing as a matter of right (People v Ball,
Under the circumstances, the defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte,
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
