History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hughes
15 N.Y.2d 172
NY
1965
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

An indigent defendant, who is by statute accorded an absolute right to appeal to the Appellate Division (or to some other appellate court), is entitled to the assignment of counsel to represent him on such appeal if he so requests. This rule applies whether the appeal be from a judgment of conviction or an order denying an application for coram nobis or habeas corpus relief. Since, then, the defendant before us was entitled to counsel in the Appellate Division, the order appealed from should be reversed and the appeal remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. We pass on no other question.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Feld, Burke and Bergan concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hughes
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 11, 1965
Citation: 15 N.Y.2d 172
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.