History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Horton
19 N.Y.2d 600
NY
1967
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeals herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendants-appellants under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated. Defendants argued that the Trial Judge failed to instruct the jury properly on the issue of the voluntariness of their confessions, and that upon the subsequent Huntley hearing the court failed to apply the proper constitutional standards in determining the voluntariness of their confessions. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions, and held that, since no error had been committed in either instance, there was no denial of defendants-appellants ’ constitutional rights. [See 18 N Y 2d 355.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Horton
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 12, 1967
Citation: 19 N.Y.2d 600
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.