The people appeal from the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion to suppress *724 certain evidence. The trial court found that the search warrant under which the evidence was seized was defective. We reverse and remand.
The alleged defect was in the description of the place to be searched. That description reads: "A two and one-half story house gray in color converted to multiple dwelling and the persons of people therein including Dennis Hopkins located at 600 South Walnut, Apartment 5, in the City of Lansing, in Ingham County, State, of Michigan.”
We find that this description is not defective, although a better statement would be, "Apartment #5 on the _ floor of a two and one-half story house, gray in color converted to multiple dwelling.”
Additionally, the affidavit on which the warrant was based contained a description, "Apartment number 5, 600 South Walnut City of Lansing.” If the description in the warrant is defective, that defect is cured by the affidavit which is to be read with the warrant in judging alleged defects,
Ellison v State,
186 Tenn 581;
Reversed and remanded.