History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Hood
1856 Cal. LEXIS 108
Cal.
1856
Check Treatment
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

The indictment in this case charges the accused of the crime of arson, in this, that on a certain day, etc., “ he did burn or cause to be burned, a certain dwelling house, etc.”

This is not a sufficient description of the offence; first, because the charge is laid in the alternative, whereas it should be special; and second, because the facts and circumstances of the alleged offence are not set forth in such a manner as to apprise the prisoner of the offénce charged against him, so that he may be prepared for his defence. See the case of the People v. Aro, April term, 1856.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Hood
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 1856 Cal. LEXIS 108
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.