People v. Holmes

May 23, 2012
Reporters:
,

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People‘s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.