Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on March 3, 1972, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon as a felony, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the convictions for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon and dismissing those counts of the indictment and otherwise affirmed. 'Grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon were lesser inclusory concurrent counts of robbery in the first degree under the facts of this case. In this case defendant could not have been found guilty of robbery in the first degree without having also been found guilty of grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon. The People concede that the judgment should be modified by dismissing the convictions for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon and by vacating the concurrent sentence imposed thereon. (People v. Pyles, 44 A D 2d 784.) We have examined the other points urged by the defendant and find them without merit. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.
People v. Hogan
47 A.D.2d 731
N.Y. App. Div.1975Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.